Flagship Vivo and Xiaomi Cut Prices, Intensifying Competition in the Smartphone Market

The competition in Indonesia’s flagship smartphone market is heating up as major Chinese brands like Vivo, Xiaomi, and Oppo lower their prices. Unlike Samsung’s steep price cuts, these price adjustments are moderate but still attract buyers looking for premium devices outside the well-known Korean and American brands. This dynamic shift provides strong alternatives for consumers considering flagship smartphones.

Chinese brands tend to launch their high-end models at competitive prices from the start. This pricing strategy results in smaller but impactful discounts later. Vivo and Oppo, in particular, aggressively maintain their resale value by strictly controlling prices at offline retailers. This approach prevents rapid depreciation and boosts consumer confidence in purchasing these brands.

Vivo X200 Pro – Price Stability Amidst New Releases
The Vivo X200 Pro remains a strong contender in the premium Android segment, holding steady at around Rp17.9 million (~$1,140) despite the anticipated arrival of its successor, the X300 Pro. This pricing stability benefits early buyers who still find high resale value, with secondhand units fetching about Rp15 million (~$955). Compared to other flagship models, where depreciation can be steeper, this represents a smaller loss of roughly Rp3-4 million (~$190-$255).

Vivo’s price retention strategy encourages customer loyalty and trust. Potential buyers who prioritize strong resale value might find the X200 Pro ideal, especially with the X300 Pro expected to launch under Rp19 million (~$1,210). This makes the X200 Pro a reliable choice for budget-conscious buyers looking for premium specs without heavy value loss.

Xiaomi 14 – Aggressively Competitive Pricing
Xiaomi 14 launched at a modest Rp11.9 million (~$755), which is already considered affordable in the flagship category. Its current market price has dipped to around Rp10.4 million (~$660) after promotional periods, such as the 11.11 sales event, where it reached Rp9.9 million (~$630). Although the price drop is around Rp1.5 million (~$95), Xiaomi’s initial low pricing means customers receive excellent value from the start.

Xiaomi’s aggressive entry pricing minimizes the impact of depreciation. Buyers get access to top-tier specifications at a more accessible cost. The recently launched Xiaomi 15 series follows a similar pricing blueprint, keeping Xiaomi 14 relevant for consumers seeking flagship performance without breaking the bank.

Oppo Find X8 Pro – Strict Price Control in Offline Markets
Oppo’s Find X8 Pro is officially priced at around Rp19 million (~$1,210) even after the introduction of the newer Find X9 Pro at the same price point. However, some marketplace vendors sell the X8 Pro at a discounted Rp16.4 million (~$1,045). This price discrepancy can confuse buyers, as the newer model offers better specs at the official price.

Oppo enforces stringent price controls among offline retailers, penalizing those who sell below the suggested retail price (SRP) with heavy fines. The brand employs mystery shoppers to ensure compliance. While this protects Oppo’s price integrity and resale value, it creates challenges for retailers competing on price, thus affecting offline sales dynamics.

iPhone 16 Pro – Apple’s Premium Price Retention
Apple remains a leader in maintaining premium pricing. The iPhone 16 Pro, recently launched, holds steady at approximately Rp20.2 million (~$1,285) for the 256GB variant, even after the iPhone 17 Pro’s arrival. This pricing consistency is partly due to tacit agreements between official distributors like iBox and Erajaya, which discourage competitive undercutting.

As a result, Apple products have high resale value, with used iPhones selling near their initial prices. Even the iPhone 16e, positioned as a premium SE model, remains priced around Rp10 million (~$635). Apple’s reluctance to slash prices reinforces the brand’s exclusivity and perceived value.

Summary of Pricing Strategies:

  1. Vivo and Oppo: Focus on stable resale value by enforcing retail price controls.
  2. Xiaomi: Aggressive initial pricing with moderate price cuts, offering affordable flagships.
  3. Apple: Maintains premium pricing with minimal discounts, preserving exclusivity.

Consumers in Indonesia’s flagship smartphone market now enjoy more choices due to these varied pricing approaches. Whether shoppers prioritize affordability, resale value, or brand prestige, the competition between Vivo, Xiaomi, Oppo, and Apple intensifies the landscape and benefits buyers.

Related News

Back to top button