Billionaire James Packer launched a fierce attack on former Victorian premier Dan Andrews and Australian gambling regulators. He accused them of unfairly targeting and undermining the casino industry, which he once led.
Packer criticized Andrews for introducing a surprise tax in 2022 that cost Crown tens of millions of dollars. He said the tax nearly stopped the $8.9 billion sale of Crown to Blackstone, a deal that ultimately allowed him to exit the casino business profitably.
Packer’s Criticism of Dan Andrews
Packer did not hold back in his remarks, calling Andrews “human filth” and blaming him for ruining both Victoria and nearly his own life. He described Andrews as one of the least liked people in the world and dared the former premier to sue him over his comments.
Andrews was contacted for comment but has not yet responded to Packer’s accusations. The former premier’s unexpected tax move blindsided Crown and damaged its profitability significantly.
Concerns Over NSW Casino Regulators
Packer also expressed strong disdain for some regulators involved in stripping Crown and Star Entertainment of their casino licenses. He specifically criticized Philip Crawford, chief regulator of the NSW Independent Casino Commission, questioning how he still holds his position.
The stricter regulations emerged after inquiries revealed both Crown and Star were involved in money laundering and had ties to criminal groups. These findings came from investigations by major media outlets and led to tightened gaming and poker machine rules.
Disparities Between Crown and Star Conduct
Packer insisted Star’s misconduct was worse than Crown’s, noting that the Australian Securities and Investments Commission never charged Crown’s board. He implied some regulators failed to act decisively against Star.
Overall, Packer’s comments reflect deep frustration with how regulatory actions and government decisions have affected Australia’s casino market. The fallout continues to reverberate across the industry, as debates about proper oversight and fairness remain unresolved.
