The Detroit Pistons currently hold a leading position in the Eastern Conference with a 24-8 record. Despite this strong start, the team faces a significant challenge that threatens their postseason ambitions.
Detroit’s three-point shooting ranks near the bottom of the league, creating a glaring offensive weakness. The team also lacks a consistent second scoring option to relieve pressure on star guard Cade Cunningham, who has delivered All-NBA level performances recently but hasn’t received adequate support.
This scoring imbalance is a persistent issue likely to carry into the playoffs. As a result, the Pistons may look to address it at the upcoming trade deadline. However, reports suggest they are unlikely to pursue major blockbuster trades, opting instead for smaller moves that preserve their core roster.
Salary Matching Challenges and Tobias Harris’ Role
One major obstacle for Detroit is managing salary matching in trades. The team’s only significant expiring contract belongs to Tobias Harris, complicating efforts to restructure the roster. Harris, who is currently shooting just 32 percent from three-point range, represents both a potential trade chip and a positional dilemma.
The Pistons need an upgrade at power forward, ideally someone who can space the floor better than Harris, aside from sharpshooter Duncan Robinson. Without a clear replacement, moving Harris could leave Detroit with a glaring hole at a crucial position.
If Detroit trades Harris, it will almost certainly need to acquire another power forward in return. Currently, Harris is the lone player filling that role, and trading him without a direct positional swap would increase the team’s size and spacing issues. Furthermore, using Harris’ expiring contract to acquire a guard would reduce the team’s frontcourt size even more.
This situation resembles a "whack-a-mole" problem, where solving one issue can unintentionally create another. The Pistons must carefully balance their desire to add offensive firepower against the risk of weakening team structure.
Trade Options Beyond Harris
Detroit still has leverage with other assets, including Caris LeVert’s contract and future draft picks. These could be valuable for minor upgrades or salary flexibility. However, if the Pistons aim to trade for a player with a near max-level contract, Harris becomes almost essential in making the finances work.
General manager Trajan Langdon faces a complex challenge: any trade involving Harris will necessitate bringing back a power forward or creatively improving other roster areas without compromising the team’s competitive stance. His approach at last year’s trade deadline, which emphasized strategic peripheral improvements, might serve as a guide for navigating these difficulties.
Conclusion
The Pistons’ biggest roster vulnerability lies in their inability to find reliable outside shooting and a balanced scoring attack, compounded by a precarious power forward situation. Addressing this at the trade deadline will require carefully constructed moves that avoid new problems, particularly regarding positional depth and salary cap limitations. Moving Tobias Harris could provide temporary relief but risks undermining frontcourt stability unless matched with a capable replacement. As the deadline approaches, Detroit’s front office will need innovative solutions that enhance the team without triggering unintended setbacks.
Read more at: pistonpowered.com
