The 2026 College Basketball Invitational (CBI) has been abruptly canceled, leaving only the College Basketball Crown as an alternative postseason option besides the NCAA Tournament and NIT. The CBI made the announcement via a social media post, citing “circumstances beyond our control” as the reason for the cancellation.
The CBI, organized by the Gazelle Group since 2008, has historically been regarded as the third-tier postseason tournament after the NCAA and NIT. However, multiple challenges have affected its sustainability in recent years. Attempts to reach the Gazelle Group for further comment have not been successful.
The CollegeInsider.com Tournament, another similar postseason event, ceased operations last year, increasing the significance of the CBI as a competitive opportunity for teams not qualified for the NCAA or NIT. Both tournaments required participating teams to pay an entry fee, which reportedly caused financial burdens and limited participation.
Historically, the CBI featured a 16-team bracket from its inception through 2019. It was canceled in 2020 due to the COVID-19 pandemic but returned with modified formats — an eight-team field in 2021 and back to 16 teams in both 2022 and 2023. The tournament’s size decreased afterward, with 14 teams in 2024 and only 11 in 2025, reflecting waning interest or logistical constraints.
By contrast, the College Basketball Crown launched its inaugural tournament last year with a 16-team field. The Crown will reduce its field to eight teams for this season but remains an appealing alternative. Its main draw is providing name, image, and likeness (NIL) payments to participating players, a unique incentive that distinguishes it from other postseason events.
This shift reshapes the landscape of men’s college basketball postseason play below the NCAA and NIT levels. Teams that miss out on the two traditional tournaments now have fewer postseason options, with the CBI’s sudden cancellation intensifying uncertainty about alternative competitions.
The cancellation marks yet another disruption in a lineage of smaller men’s postseason tournaments struggling for viability amid changing economic conditions and evolving college sports governance. The continued appeal of postseason play for mid-major programs now may depend heavily on the ability to offer meaningful financial incentives like those in the Crown tournament.
As of now, the CBI’s future beyond 2026 remains unclear, and stakeholders remain focused on ensuring opportunities exist for competitive postseason experiences that support player development and program exposure.
Read more at: www.espn.com
