Candace Owens recently made an explosive claim about the shooting incident involving Charlie Kirk, asserting the official story does not add up. She shared her perspective during a livestream with Myron Gaines on YouTube in November, stating that key details surrounding the shooting appear incomplete and misleading.
Owens highlighted that the public has yet to see the exact moment the shot was fired. Instead, only a brief clip shows someone running immediately after the shooting. This lack of clear footage raises questions for Owens, who believes the narrative presented to the public is partial at best.
Tyler Robinson’s Involvement Questioned
A central point Owens discussed was Tyler Robinson, the man accused of shooting Charlie Kirk. She acknowledged that Robinson’s fingerprints were found on the gun involved but emphasized these were not the only prints present. Owens argued that this fact has not been adequately disclosed or investigated in public discussions.
She further claimed Robinson may not have physically been on the campus that day. According to Owens, Robinson’s role was limited to picking up clothing and leaving them at locations such as a Dairy Queen and a cemetery, suggesting a more complex coordination.
The Role of Lance Twiggs
Owens introduced Lance Twiggs as a significant figure potentially more involved than Robinson. She described Twiggs as Robinson’s partner and suggested he played a deeper part in the event, though she does not believe Twiggs was the one who fired the shot.
Supporting her assertion, Owens referred to a TMZ video from September showing a person walking toward Utah Valley University hours before the shooting. Owens identified this person, dressed in a maroon shirt and black cap, as Twiggs, not Robinson. She argued that the physical appearance of the individual in the video does not match Robinson, reinforcing her theory of multiple actors with divided roles.
Complex Plot Theory
Based on her observations, Owens suggested the shooting was a planned setup with several people involved in different capacities. She theorized that each person acted as a patsy tasked with small duties designed to create confusion and obscure the full truth.
Owens’ claims raise important questions about the investigation’s transparency and the complexity of the shooting event. The narrative she presents challenges the official account and calls for a more thorough examination of all associated individuals and evidence.
Read more at: timesofindia.indiatimes.com
